Appling who is going to the grievances redress sinologist Kubin

 Reviews of Appling

a few years ago, the German scholar Mr. Gu Bin as a It can be said of contemporary literature They are filled with indignation, outrage in Japan, continue to throw a call to arms and an angry, for a love of Chinese culture, decades of painstaking research scholar of Chinese literature were carpet-bombing-like slap in the face.

In fact, the so-called When the deduction of the fake news! They are like Don Quixote, windmills, like World War II, the German scholar Mr. Gu Bin imaginary enemy as a way forward and windmills, they use spears and anger

Now time has passed for nearly four years of fighting this war not only never windmill break, but instead intensified. Critics in those extreme view, the eyes of contemporary Chinese literature is their beautiful 杜尔西内亚, where half the volume had people say ugly words. Don Quixote, based on this ridiculous mentality of some well-known literary critic actually taking a . The eyes of Valentine's pockmarked dimples really changed. This inevitably brings to mind those who have been extremely timid heart, at through the night about ghosts Shiyou fear of other people, and deliberately lifts his voice, like singing loudly, just to make people laugh.

in the Contemporary literature is rubbish Such as: the most recent period of time, for the evaluation of contemporary literature produced some controversy. Representatives of both sides debate the German scholar Gu Bin, professor of philosophy at Tsinghua University and Peking University professor Xiao Ying Chen Xiaoming et al. Chen Xiaoming singing (clarified, however, literary critics such as ours has always wearing colored glasses, the scholar Kubin stalker. These literary critics really do not know, Things have gone nearly four years, do they really still kept in the dark? Really do not know Chinese, regardless of Wei. So be out of touch with reality and opinionated, not in their literature how to draw ridiculous conclusions? More is convulsed, in the derivation of this absurd conclusion, the Mr. Lin Nan Road, actually questioned the force of justice: Here, I would like to ask Mr. Gu Bin: Since the Chinese contemporary literature is of another, also depends on Sinology doing? What's more, you really can read Chinese literature? You really do a Xiao Ying and ask you not to because there are a number of foreigners studying Chinese literature to show strong interest in, put something between their gods. This is to belittle these scholar, is to demean your own.

Mr. Lin Nan read the article in this crusade against impulsive, I really admire those who are ignorant of their dauntless courage. In Mr. Lin Nan seems as if all foreigners are idiots, know where to read Chinese literature. Mr. Lin Nan obviously not carefully verify their own Kubin pot braise them with Xiao Ying. Is Mr. Lin Nan, the basic bottom line of what is meant by scholarly articles? A work of even the basic Quweicunzhen do not want honest people to do, where can we talk about the correctness of his academic articles and impartiality? I remember in late March of this year, in Phoenix, . but in an interview, said that contemporary Chinese literature is rubbish, everyone knows the words. Mr. Gu Bin immediately denied, said: . Dou Wentao, said: Even if Mr. Gu Bin completely covered the mouth, I am afraid it can never tell the. China's literary world, ah, when will redress this injustice from the king of?